Authors
- Mishi Choudhary (rss)
- Eben Moglen (rss)
- Laura Moy (rss)
- Lysandra Ohrstrom (rss)
- Michael A. Spiegel (rss)
- James Vasile (rss)
- Aaron Williamson (rss)
Tags
- Software Freedom Law Center (rss)
- free software (rss)
- Bilski v. Kappos (rss)
- Eben Moglen (rss)
- licensing (rss)
- patents (rss)
- security (rss)
- Social Networking (rss)
- Software Patents (rss)
- Source Code (rss)
- technology (rss)
- Technology Policy (rss)
- Etisalat (rss)
- 101 Rejection (rss)
- Adobe (rss)
- Airtel (rss)
- Bilski (rss)
- Biotechnology (rss)
- Breast Cancer (rss)
- Cisco (rss)
- community (rss)
- Consumer Electronics (rss)
- Consumer Electronics Show (rss)
- copyright (rss)
- Copyright Law (rss)
- Cuba (rss)
- Diebold (rss)
- DNA (rss)
- EAR (rss)
- eBook Readers (rss)
- Embargo (rss)
- encryption (rss)
- enforcement (rss)
- Export (rss)
- firmware (rss)
- First Amendment (rss)
- Free Software Foundation (rss)
- free software security (rss)
- Google (rss)
- gpl (rss)
- India (rss)
- Information Technology Act (rss)
- infringement (rss)
- Internet Freedom (rss)
- Iran (rss)
- James Vasile (rss)
- John Gilmore (rss)
- Judge Sweet (rss)
- Laura Moy (rss)
- Libre Planet (rss)
- Michael Spiegel (rss)
- Mishi Choudhary (rss)
- mobile (rss)
- Myriad Genetics (rss)
- Obama (rss)
- OFAC (rss)
- Online Privacy (rss)
- oracle-sun (rss)
- Ovarian Cancer (rss)
- Patentability (rss)
- Proudler (rss)
- Proudler Patent Rejection (rss)
- public review (rss)
- public safety (rss)
- recall (rss)
- Research in Motion (rss)
- Sanctions (rss)
- Sequoia (rss)
- smartphones (rss)
- Software Freedom Law Center India (rss)
- Sudan (rss)
- The New York Times (rss)
- The Statute of Anne (rss)
- The Supreme Court of the United States (rss)
- toyota (rss)
- Twitter (rss)
- Vodafone (rss)
- voting machines (rss)
December 14, 2009 by Eben Moglen
The European Commission and Oracle-Sun
I spent last Thursday and Friday in Brussels, attending the European Commission’s Oral Hearing in the competition investigation of the acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle. The proceedings at the Oral Hearing were confidential; I cannot write about the presentations made there by others. I can, however, summarize the three points I made during my brief presentation on Friday; my previous written submission to the commission is already available. I want to explain what I said and where I think we stand now that the Oral Hearing is over.
Full post herePosted by Eben Moglen on December 14, 2009. Please email any comments on this entry to press@softwarefreedom.org.
![[frdm] Support SFLC](/img/support-sflc.png){kind=small}